Voters say no to changing length of council terms

Related Articles

 
Saturday was election day for local municipalities including Kennedale. Normally this would be the time to vote for school board and city council members but of the five positions open for election the year (2 school board and 3 city council) none drew more than one candidate. {{more:[read more]}}
 
As a result, elections for those positions were called off and the candidates in those open positions will be sworn in this month as official members of the city council or school board. But, the City held an election on seven proposed amendments to the city charter.
 
less than 4% turnout …
 
Since there was no excitement of any contested election for office to draw in the voters, the turnout was low – just 153 voters out of 4,586 registerd voters (3.3%). Those who did vote, supported the amendments save one – longer terms for elected officials.
 
Of the seven charter amendments proposed only one was defeated, Proposition 4 by a vote of 80-71. The proposition would have changed the current two year terms of office for the mayor and city council positions to three year staggered terms of office with two positions up for elections each year.
 
It would not have affected the terms of office of current elected officials but those running for election next year.
 
Election results …
  • Proposition 1 ? Vacancies in office Yes ? total 153: For 100 (65.4%) – Against 53 (34.5%) Determines how vacancies would be filled if terms of office were three years.
  • Proposition 2 ? Forfeiture of Office Yes ? total 152: For 88 (57.9%) – Against 64 (42.1%) Allows the city council to determine the reason or condition for loss of office by a sitting council member or mayor.
  • Propostion 3 ? Meeting Procedure Yes ? total 153: For 81 (52.9%) ? Against 72 (47.0%) Defines a quorum to conduct business as a majority of council members and does not include the mayor in that count.
  • Proposition 4 ? Places and terms of office No ? total 153: For 71 (47.0%) ? Against 80 (53.0%) Change the current two year terms of office for the mayor and city council positions to three year staggered terms of office with two positions up for elections each year.
  • Proposition 5 ? City Secretary Yes ? total 152: For 91 (60%) ? Against 61 (40%) Gives the power of the appointment of the City Secretary to the city council upon a recommendation of the city manager and allows the city manager the responsibility of hiring other staff as authorized.
  • Proposition 6 ? Budget Yes ? total 153: 128 (83.7%) ? Against 24 (16.3%) Sets the deadline for the city manager to submit annual city budget to on or before August 15th
  • Proposition 7 ? Audit Yes ? Total 153: For 125 (82.2%) ? Against 27 (17.8%) Requires the submission of annual independent city audit no later tha 180 days after the end of the city’s fiscal year.
 

More on this topic

Comments

Comments are closed.

Advertismentspot_img

Popular stories